twitter

Prev

Next

The Virtues of Ramadaan The Virtues of Ramadaan by Muhammad Sâlih al-Munajjid What is Ramadan? Praise be to Allah. Ramadan is one of the twelve Arabic months. It is a month which is venerated in the Islamic religion, and it is distinguished from the other months by a number of characteristics and virtues, including the following: 1 –...

Readmore

Is it permissible for the breast-feeding woman to break... Q. Is it permissible for the breast-feeding woman to break her fast? And when should she make up for it? And may she feed (poor people instead of fasting)? A. If the breast-feeding woman fears that fasting will harm her child by reducing the milk, then she may break her fast, but she must make up for it later, because...

Readmore

A young girl had her menstrual period and was fasting... Q. A young girl had her menstrual period and was fasting during the days of menstruation due to ignorance; what is incumbent upon her? A. She must make up for the days which she fasted while she was menstruating, because fasting on the days of menstruation is not accepted, and it is invalid, even if she was ignorant,...

Readmore

Period-delaying pills to fast the whole month of Ramadan Q 2: I have taken contraceptive pills in Ramadan. Should I make up for the days during which I did not have my period through the contraceptive effect of the pills and so I observed Sawm (Fasting) and offered Salah (Prayer) on them with the people? Is there any sin on me for taking these pills? A: It is permissible...

Readmore

Ulum al Qur'an : An Introduction to the Sciences of... Assalaamu 'Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful Ulum al Qur'an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur'an Part 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHAPTER 1: The Qur'an and...

Readmore

*~Ramadan Reminders~* Rss

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 51

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 51 —————————————————————————————————

CHAPTER 6 – Interpreting the Text

TAFSIR, ITS KINDS AND PRINCIPLES

Tafsir by sahaba

Tafsir by sahaba [For a brief summary on early Tafsir see al-Sawwaf, 'Early Tafsir', in Ahmad, K. and Z. 1. Ansari. Islamic Perspectives. Leicester, 1979, pp.l35-45.]

Next, after explanation of the Qur’an by the Qur’an and of the Qur’an by the Prophet himself, ranks the explanation of the Qur’an by the sahaba. Among them, the following were best known for their knowledge of and contribution to the field of tafsir: Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthman, ‘All (not much has been reported from them), Ibn Mas’ud, Ibn ‘Abbas, ‘Ubay b. Ka’b, Zaid b. Thabit, Abu Musa al-Ash’arl, ‘Abdullah b. Zubair.

Ibn ‘Abbas

Abdullah b. ‘Abbas (d. 68/687) is considered to be the most knowledgeable of the Companions in tafsir. [A book entitled tanwir al-miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas (Beirut, n.d.) is a complete tafsir of the Qur'an. all explanations of which are said to go back to Ibn 'Abbas. On the question of authenticity, see al-Sawwaf, op.cit. p. 140.] He has been called ‘tarjuman al-qur’an’, the interpreter of the Qur’an. Since he was related to the Prophet, being his cousin, and his maternal aunt Maimuna being one of the Prophet’s wives, he was very close to the Prophet Muhammad and learnt much about the revelation. It is said that he saw the Angel Gabriel twice. Apart from his detailed knowledge of everything concerning tafsir, he is also given the credit for having emphasised one of the basic principles of ‘ilm al-tafsir which has remained important to this day, namely, that the meaning of words, especially of unusual words in the Qur’an ought to be traced back to their usage in the language of pre-Islamic poetry. There is a long list of such explanations quoted by Suyutl. [Itqan 1 pp.120-33.]

Example:

The following is an example of tafsir from a sahabl, namely Ibn ‘Abbas, confirmed by ‘Umar:

‘So celebrate the praises of your Lord, and ask for His forgiveness. Verily! He is the one who accepts the repentance and forgives’ (110: 3).

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: ‘Umar used to make me sit with the elderly men who had fought in the battle of Badr. Some of them felt it (did not like that3 and said to ‘Umar: ‘Why do you bring in this boy to sit with us, while we have sons like him?’

‘Umar replied ‘Because of what you know of his position’ (i.e. his religious knowledge).

One day ‘Umar called me and made me sit in the gathering of those people, and I think that he called me just to show them (my religious knowledge). ‘Umar then asked them in my presence: ‘What do you say about the interpretation of the statement of Allah’.

‘When comes help of Allah, and the conquest . . .’ (110: 1).

Some of them said: ‘We are ordered to praise Allah and ask for His forgiveness, when Allah’s help and the conquest (of Makka) comes to us’. Some others kept quiet and did not say anything. On that ‘Umar asked me: ‘Do you say the same, O Ibn ‘Abbas?’ I replied: ‘No’. He said: ‘What do you say then?’ I replied: ‘That is the sign of the death of Allah’s apostle which Allah informed him of. Allah said:

‘(O Muhammad) when comes the help of Allah (to you against your enemies) and the conquest (of Makka) (which is the sign of your death) – you should celebrate the praises of your Lord and ask for His forgiveness, and He is the One who accepts the repentance and forgives’ (110:1-3). On that ‘Umar said: ‘I do not know anything about it other than what you have said’. [Bukhari, Vl, No. 494.]

Another short example is:

Narrated ‘Ata’: When Ibn ‘Abbas heard:

‘Have you not seen those who have changed the favour of Allah into disbelief?’ (14: 28).

He said: ‘Those were the disbelieving pagans of Makka. * [Bukhari Vl No. 222.]

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 6

Category : al-Aqeedah

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 6

———————–

From the texts of the Book and the Sunnah are those which are ’aam (general); which is defined as that word which is inclusive of many ajnaas (categories), anwaa’ (types) and afraad (individuals). This majority of the texts are of this nature. Other texts are khaass (specific), and are indicative of only some categories, types and individuals. Thus, if there does not exist any contradiction between the ’aam and the khaass texts, then each of them are independently acted upon. However, if a contradiction is presumed, then the ’aam is specified and delineated by the khaas.

From the texts are the mutlaq (absolute) and the muqayyad (restricted) ones. It is restricted by a description or a reliable restriction. Thus, the mutlaq is restricted and qualified by the muqayyad.

And from the texts are the mujmal (comprehensive) and mubayyan (explicit). Whatever the Lawgiver has made comprehensive in one place, yet made it explicit in another, then it is obligatory to return to what the Lawgiver made mubayyan (explicit). Many of the rulings in the Qur‘aan are mujmal (comprehensive) in nature, but have been explicitly explained in the Sunnah. So it is obligatory to return to the bayaan (explicit clarification) of the Messenger sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam, since he is the clear explainer from Allaah.

Similar to this are the texts that are muhkam (equivocal and singular in meaning) and those that are mutashaabih (unequivocal and open to more than one meaning). It is obligatory to understand the mutashaabih in the light of those texts that are muhkam.

Amongst the texts are the naasikh (abrogating) and the mansookh (abrogated) The abrogated texts in the Qur‘aan and the Sunnah are few in number. Whenever there is the possibility of harmonising two texts, with the possibility of each one being acted upon in its own particular circumstance, then it is obligatory to do so. One may not turn to abrogation, except with a text from the Lawgiver, or an apparent contradiction between two authentic texts concerning which there is no possible way to resolve this contradiction such that each text is acted upon in its own particular circumstance. In this case, the later text abrogates the earlier one. However, if it is impossible to determine which is the earlier text and which is the later, we then turn to other means of tarjeeh (prefering one text over another). For example, when there is an (apparent) contradiction between the Prophet sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam’s statement and his action, then precedence is given to his saying. This is because his statement represents either a command or a prohibition to his Ummah, whereas his action is, in this case, interpreted to be something particular to him alone. So the khasaa‘is (particular and unique rulings) pertaining to the Prophet sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam are actually based upon this asl (fundamental principle).

Likewise, when the Prophet sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam does something as an act of ’ibaadah (worship), but he does not command its performance, then what is correct is that this action of his is indicative of it being mustahabb (recommended). If he does something as an act of ’aadah (custom or habit), then it is indicative of it being mubaah (permissible).

Whatever the Prophet sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam acknowledges of statements and actions, then the ruling is one of ibaahah (permissibility), or other than it, according to the manner in which he acknowledged such statements and actions.

—————

Reference:

Usool ul-Fiqh

by Shaykh ‘Abdur-Rahmân ibn Nâsir as-Sa’dî

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 50

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 50 —————————————————————————————————

CHAPTER 6 – Interpreting the Text

TAFSIR, ITS KINDS AND PRINCIPLES

The Qur’an explained by the Qur’an

The interpretation of the Qur’an by the Qur’an is the highest source of tafsir. Many of the questions which may arise out of a certain passage of the Qur’an have their explanation in other parts of the very same book, and often there is no need to turn to any sources other than the word of Allah, which in itself contains tafsir. To seek to explain an aya from the Qur’an by referring to another aya from the Qur’an is the first and foremost duty of the mufassir. Only if this does not suffice, he will refer to other sources of tafsir. [Itqan, 11, pp.181-2.]

Examples:

A case in point is the detailed explanation of 5:2 by 5:4, concerning permissible and prohibited meat. Another example of explanation of one aya in the Qur’an by another concerns a question which might arise from Surah 44: 3. It is explained in Surah 97: 1:

‘We sent it down during a blessed night’ (44: 3).

Which night is this blessed night, in which the Qur’an was sent down?

‘We have indeed revealed this in the lailat al-qadr’ (97: 1).

A third example is the explanation of Surah 2:37 by Surah 7:23:

‘Then learnt Adam from his Lord words of inspiration, and his Lord turned towards him, for He is Oft-Returning, Most Merciful’ (2: 37).

These ‘words of inspiration’ are explained by the Qur’an as follows:

‘Our Lord! We have wronged our own souls. If Thou forgive us not, and bestow not upon us Thy mercy, we shall certainly be lost’ (7: 23).

The Qur’an explained by the Prophet

There are numerous examples of explanation of the Qur’an by the Prophet, who either himself asked the Angel Gabriel for explanation of matters not clear to him, or who was asked by the Companions about the Qur’an. Suyuti has given a long list of explanations of the Qur’an by the Prophet sura by sura. [Itqan, 11, pp. 191-205.]

Here one example may suffice:

‘And eat and drink until the white thread of dawn appears to you distinct from its black thread. . .’ (2: 187).

Narrated ‘Adi b. Hatim: I said: ‘O Allah’s Apostle! What is the meaning of the white thread distinct from the black thread? Are these two threads?’ He said: ‘You are not intelligent, if you watch the two threads’. He then added, ‘No, it is the darkness of the night and the whiteness of the day’. [Itqan 11. pp. 191-205.]

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 49

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 49 —————————————————————————————————

CHAPTER 6 – Interpreting the Text

TAFSIR, ITS KINDS AND PRINCIPLES

Grades of Sources [See Ibn Taimiya, op.cit., p.93.]

The best Tafsir is the explanation of the Qur’an by the Qur’an.

The next best is the explanation of the Qur’an by the Prophet Muhammad, who, as Shafi’i explained, acted according to what he understood from the Qur’an.

If nothing can be found in the Qur’an nor in the sunna of the Prophet, one turns to the reports from the sahaba. [See Ibn Taimiya, op.cit., p.95.]

If nothing can be found in the Qur’an, the sunna and the reports from the sahaba, one turns to the reports from the tabi’un. [See Ibn Taimiya, op.cit., p. 102.]

However, nothing can match the explanation of the Qur’an by the Qur’an and the explanation of the Qur’an by the Prophet.

Kinds of Tafsir

Tafsir may be divided into three basic groups: [This classification has been borrowed from Sabuni, tibyan, p.63. See also Qattan, op.cit. section 25.]
Tafsir bi-l-riwaya (by transmission), also known as Tafsir bi-l-ma’thur.
Tafsir bi’l-ra’y (by sound opinion; also known as tafsir bi-l-diraya, by knowledge).
Tafsir bi-l-ishara (by indication, from signs).

Tafsir bi-l-riwaya

By this is meant all explanations of the Qur’an which can be traced back through a chain of transmission to a sound source, i.e.:

The Qur’an itself.
The explanation of the Prophet.
The explanation by Companions of the Prophet (to some extent).

Naturally, the explanation of the Qur’an by the Qur’an and the explanation of the Qur’an by the Prophet are the two highest sources for tafsir, which cannot be matched nor superseded by any other source. Next to these rank the explanations by the sahaba, since the sahaba were witnesses to the revelations, were educated and trained by the Prophet himself and were closest to the period of the first Muslim umma. Of course all reports of explanations by the Prophet or by a sahabi must be sound according to the science of riwaya as in ‘ulum al-hadith.

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 5

Category : al-Aqeedah

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 5

———————–

The asl (fundamental principle) concerning commands in the Book and the Sunnah is that they are indicative of a wujoob (obligation), except if there is an evidence to indicate to it being mustahabb (recommended) of mubaah (permissible) The asl concerning prohibitions is that they are indicative of tahreem (forbiddance), except if there is an evidence indicating it being makrooh (hated).

The asl governing kalaam (speech) is that it is to be taken upon its haqeeqah (literal sense). So it is not to be turned away from it to its majaaz (figurative meaning) – if we accept this – except when it is impossible to employ its haqeeqah (literal meaning) Al-Haqaa‘iq (literal meanings) are of three types:

[i] shar’iyyah (that which is defined by the Sharee’ah), [ii] lughawiyyah (that which is defined by language) and [iii] ’urfiyyah (that which is defined by customary usage).

So whatever ruling the Shaari’ (Lawgiver) has defined, then it is obligatory to return it to the Sharee’ah definition. However, what the Lawgiver has ruled, but not defined, sufficing by its apparent linguistic meaning, then it is obligatory to return it to its linguistic meaning. But whatever has not been defined, neither in the Sharee’ah, nor in the language; then it is obligatory to refer it back to the habits of the people, and their customary usage. The Shaari’ (Lawgiver) may clearly specify to return these matters to ’urf (customary usage); such as commanding the good, living well with one’s wife, and other similar matters.

So memorise these usool concerning which the faqeeh stands in need of in all his dealings of fiqh.

—————

Reference:

Usool ul-Fiqh

by Shaykh ‘Abdur-Rahmân ibn Nâsir as-Sa’dî

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 48

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 48 —————————————————————————————————

CHAPTER 6 – Interpreting the Text

TAFSIR, ITS KINDS AND PRINCIPLES

Tafsir (exegesis) of the Qur’an is the most important science for Muslims. All matters concerning the Islamic way of life are connected to it in one sense or another since the right application of Islam is based on proper understanding of the guidance from Allah. Without tafsir there would be no right understanding of various passages of the Qur’an.

Tafsir and Ta’wil

The word tafsir is derived from the root ‘fassara’ – to explain, to expound. It means ‘explanation’ or ‘interpretation’. In technical language the word tafsir is used for explanation, interpretation and commentary on the Qur’an, comprising all ways of obtaining knowledge, which contributes to the proper understanding of it, explains its meanings and clarifies its legal implications. [See Zarkashi, op.cit., 1, p. 13.] The word mufassir (pl. mufassirun) is the term used for the person doing the tafsir, i.e. the ‘exegete’ or ‘commentator’.

The word ta’wil, which is also used in this connection, is derived from the root ‘awwala’ and also means ‘explanation, interpretation’ .

In technical language it similarly refers to explanation and interpretation of the Qur’an.

Tafsir in the language of the scholars means explanation and clarification. It aims at knowledge and understanding concerning the book of Allah, to explain its meanings, extract its legal rulings and grasp its underlying reasons. Tafsir explains the ‘outer’ (zahir) meanings of the Qur’an. Ta’wil is considered by some to mean the explanation of the inner and concealed meanings of the Qur’an, as far as a knowledgeable person can have access to them. Others are of the opinion that there is no difference between Tafsir and ta’wil.

Why is it Important?

There are a number of reasons why Tafsir is of great importance, but the basic reason is the following: Allah has sent the Qur’an as a book of guidance to mankind. Man’s purpose is to worship Allah, i.e. to seek His pleasure by living the way of life Allah has invited him to adopt. He can do so within the framework of the guidance that Allah has revealed concerning this, but he can do so only if he properly understands its meanings and implications.

Basic Conditions

Muslim scholars have laid down certain basic conditions for sound Tafsir. Any Tafsir, which disregards these principles must be viewed with great caution, if not rejected altogether. The most important among these conditions are the following:

The mufassir must:

Be sound in belief (‘aqida).
Well-grounded in the knowledge of Arabic and its rules as a language.
Well-grounded in other sciences that are connected with the study of the Qur’an (e.g. ‘ilm al-riwaya).
Have the ability for precise comprehension.
Abstain from the use of mere opinion.
Begin the Tafsir of the Qur’an with the Qur’an.
Seek guidance from the words and explanations of the Prophet.
Refer to the reports from the sahaba.
Consider the reports from the tabi’un.
Consult the opinions of other eminent scholars.

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 3

Category : al-Aqeedah

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 3

———————–

Chapter 3

The adillah (evidences) that fiqh is derived from are four:-

The Book and the Sunnah, and these two are the foundation by which the mukallafoon (the morally responsible) are addressed, and upon which is built their Religion. Then ijmaa’ (consensus) and al-qiyaasus-saheeh (sound and correct analogy), these two are derived from the Book and the Sunnah. So fiqh – in its entirety – does not leave the realms of these four usool (fundamentals).

The majority of the important ahkaam(rulings) are indicated to by these four adillah (evidences). They are indicated to by the nusoos (texts) from the Book and the Sunnah; and the Scholars have ijmaa’ (consensus) about them, and they are indicated to by qiyaasus-saheeh (sound and correct analogy); because of what they entail of benefit, if it is a command; or what they contain of harm, if it is a forbiddance. Very few of the ahkaam have been differed over by the Scholars. In such cases the closest of them to the truth is the one who correctly refers back to these four usool.

—————

Reference:

Usool ul-Fiqh

by Shaykh ‘Abdur-Rahmân ibn Nâsir as-Sa’dî

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 47

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 47 —————————————————————————————————

CHAPTER 5: Understanding the Text

THE VARIOUS READINGS

Other Views

Later on other views emerged, making ten or fourteen well-known readings. In addition to the seven above, the following make up the ten and the fourteen readers:

Place Reader Transmitter

Madina

Abu Ja’far (130/747)

Basra

Ya’qub (205/820)

Kufa

Khalaf (229/843)

Basra

Hasan al Basri (110/728)

Makka

Ibn Muhaisin (123/740)

Basra

Yahya al-Yazidi (202/817)

Kufa

al-A’mash (148/765)

The readings are also divided as follows: [Suyuti, Itqan, I, p 77]

The mutawatir (transmitted by many; they include the seven well-known readings).

The ahad (transmitted by one; they number three, going back to the sahaba and together with the seven make up the ten).

The shadh (exceptional; they go back to the tabi’un only).

Muslim scholars have laid down three criteria for the acceptance of any qira’a and three criteria for preferring some over others. The best transmission was of course mutawatir. The three criteria for acceptance of other readings are:

Correctness according to Arabic grammar.

Agreement with the written text of ‘Uthman.

Traced back reliably to the Prophet.

The three criteria for preference are:

Correctness according to Arabic grammar.

Agreement with the written text of ‘Uthman.

Reported/preferred by many (majority).

Summary

The best summary on this topic is perhaps contained in the words of the scholar Abu-l-Khair bin al-Jazari (d.833/1429), who wrote:

‘Every reading in accordance with Arabic (grammar) even if (only) in some way, and in accordance with one of the masahif of ‘Uthman, even if (only) probable, and with sound chain of transmission, is a correct (sahih) reading, which must not be rejected, and may not be denied, but it belongs to the seven modes (ahruf) according to which the Qur’an was revealed, and the people are obliged to accept it, no matter whether it is from the seven Imams, or the ten or from other accepted Imams, but when one of these three conditions is not fulfilled, it must be rejected as weak (daif) or exceptional (shadh) or void (batil), no matter whether it is from the seven or from one who is older than them.’ [Suyuti, Itqan, I, p.75

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 2

Category : al-Aqeedah

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Usool ul-Fiqh Part 2

———————–

Chapter 2

The ahkaam (rulings) upon which fiqh revolve are five:-

Waajib (obligation): that for which the one who performs it is rewarded, whilst the one who abandons it is punished.
Haraam (prohibition): this is the opposite of an obligation.
Masnoon (recommended): that for which the one who performs it is rewarded, whilst the one who leaves it is not punished.
Makrooh (detested): this is the opposite of a recommendation.
Mubaah (permissible): this is where both (its doing or leaving) are equivalent.

Those rulings which are waajib (obligatory) are divided into two catagories: fard ’ayn (individual obligation), the doing of which is sought from every mukallaf (morally responsible), baaligh (mature) ’aaqil (sane) person. The majority of the Sharee’ah rulings enter into this catagory. The second is fard kifaayah (collective obligation), the performance of which is sought from the morally responsible collectively, but not from every individual specifcally; such as the learning of the various branches of useful knowledge and useful industries; the adhaan; the commanding of good and forbidding of evil; and other similar matters.

These five rulings differ widely in accordance with its state, its levels and its effects.

Thus, whatever is of pure or of overwhelming maslah (benefit), then the Shaari’ (Lawgiver) has commanded its performance with either an obligation or a recommendation. Whatever is of pure, or of overwhelming mafsadah (harm), then the Lawgiver has stopped its doing with either an absolute prohibition or dislike. So this asl (fundamental principle) encompasses all matters commanded of prohibited by the Lawgiver.

As for those matters which the Lawgiver has permitted and allowed, then at times they lead to that which is good, and so are joined to those matters which have been commanded; and at other times they lead to that which is evil, and so are joined to those matters which are prohibited. So this is a great asl that: “al-wasaa‘ilu lahaa ahkaamul-maqaasid (the means take on the same ruling as their aims).”

From this we learn that: “maa yatimmul-waajib illaa bihi fahuwa waajib (whatever is required to fulfill an obligation is itself an obligation).” Likewise, whatever is required to fufill a masnoon (recomendation) is itself recommened. Whatever leads to the establishment of a haraam (prohibition) is itself prohibited. And whatever leads to the establishment of a makrooh (detested act) is itself detested.

—————

Reference:

Usool ul-Fiqh

by Shaykh ‘Abdur-Rahmân ibn Nâsir as-Sa’dî

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 46

Category : Quran al-Majeed

Assalaamu ‘Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu

In the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful

Ulum al Qur’an : An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an Part 46 ——————————————————————————————————————-

CHAPTER 5: Understanding the Text

THE VARIOUS READINGS

Readers among the Sababa

Reading and reciting of the Qur’an has been done since revelation began, and the Prophet was the first to recite. This has already been discussed in the section on transmission of the text. After his death, the recitation continued through his Companions. Among the famous readers from whom many of the tabi’un learned, were Ubay bin Ka’b, ‘Ali, Zaid bin Tbabit, Ibn Mas’ud, Abu Musa al-Ash’ari and many others.

Later Development

Later on, with Muslims settling in many parts of the world, the Qur’an was recited in a variety of ways, some of which were not in accordance with the accepted text and the transmitted readings from the Prophet and the Companions. This necessitated a thorough screening and distinction between what is sahih (sound) and what is shadh (exceptional).

The Seven Readings

The ‘seven readings’ were standardised in the second/eighth century. Ibn Mujahid, a ninth-century Muslim scholar, wrote a book entitled The Seven Readings, in which he selected seven of the prevailing modes of recitation as the best transmitted and most reliable. Others were subsequently disfavoured and even opposed, among them the readings of Ibn Mas’ud and ‘Ubay bin Ka’b. However, this is not to say that one must restrict oneself to one of these seven readings, or to all of them. Below are listed the local origin of the seven readings and the names of readers [For their short biographies see Fihrist ,I, p. 63ff.] and some transmitters (rawis) connected with them:

Madina

Nafi’ (169/785) Warsh (197/812)

Makka

Ibn Kathir (120/737)

Damascus

Ibn ‘Amir (118/736)

Basra

Abu ‘Amr (148/770)

Kufa

‘Asim (127/744) Hafs (180/796)

Kufa

Hamza (156/772)

Kufa

Al-Kisa’i (189/804) Duri (246/860)

Readings No. 1 and 5 are of particular importance: the reading transmitted by Warsh is widespread in Africa, except Egypt, where, as now in almost all other parts of the Muslim world, the reading transmitted by Hafs is observed.

————–

Reference:

Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an

AHMAD VON DENFFER